The abrupt closing of activist short-seller Hindenburg highlights 'wear and tear' of betting against stocks


Hindenburg Research was widely recognized as a top performer in the world of activist short selling.

That’s why its abrupt shutdown last week sent waves across an industry in which pointing out company fraud and misconduct has become one of the riskiest, burdensome, and loathed corners of Wall Street.

Founder Nate Anderson gave no specific reason when he announced the closure of his firm, which rose to fame in 2020 with the short call of electric vehicle startup Nikola (NKLA). Since then, his targets have included Indian conglomerate Adani, holding conglomerate Icahn Enterprises (IEP), and most recently, server maker Super Micro Computer (SMCI).

“So why disband now? There is not one specific thing — no particular threat, no health issue, and no big personal issue,” wrote Anderson on his firm’s site. He credited Hindenburg’s work for playing a role in nearly 100 individuals charged civilly or criminally, “including billionaires and oligarchs.”

But some industry watchers aren’t totally surprised to see the iconic short seller close shop a little more than a year after Jim Chanos, famous for wagering against Enron in 2001 also threw in the towel.

“It’s a very tough business not just because markets rip and are built to go up, but it puts a lot of wear and tear on you,” Carson Block, founder and chief investment officer of Muddy Waters Capital told Yahoo Finance.

Simply put, the business of short selling in public has become increasingly scrutinized, litigious, and costly.

“Every year the bar to find ‘stories,’ for lack of a better word, that investors would care about gets higher,” Block explained. “There’s just more complacency built in because basically all this easy money was anesthetizing investors to risk.”

Short sellers borrow shares of a company they believe will go down in value and sell them. Once the stock price drops, they buy the shares back and return them to the lender, making a profit on the downside. Activist short sellers go further: They make a living by publishing reports claiming fraud or other misconduct at a company — and gain when its stock falls. Industry insiders say their research may include information from hedge funds looking to avoid recognition.

Depending on the structure of a deal, the research may be shared for free with the short-selling firm. Agreements can include shared profits or payment for legal fees in case the target company sues.

Though hedge funds tend to use short selling as an “insurance” to reduce exposure against a market drawdown or correction, the practice of exposing overvaluation or fraud hasn’t been widely appreciated by most investors in a bull market, said Drayton D’Silva, CEO and chief investment officer at Tower Hills Capital.





Source link

About The Author

Scroll to Top