Walmart(NYSE: WMT) is one of the largest retailers in the world. It has achieved massive success with its large format box stores, Sam’s Club stores, and its smaller grocery store locations. But that doesn’t mean that everything it touches turns to gold. The company’s recent $2.3 billion investment in Vizio is one endeavor that investors will want to monitor closely.
One of the most notable acquisitions that retailer Walmart has made in recent years was Jet.com. This roughly $3.3 billion deal goes back to 2016 when Walmart was looking to compete online with Amazon.com(NASDAQ: AMZN). While the Jet.com deal was less than a decade ago, it seems like a totally different time.
Image source: Getty Images.
Back then, Walmart’s online presence wasn’t particularly impressive, and Amazon was still in the early days of its growth. According to Walmart:
The acquisition will build on and complement the significant foundation already in place to serve customers across the Walmart app, site, and stores and position the company for even faster e-commerce growth in the future by expanding customer reach and adding new capabilities.
That’s a bit of cheerleading, which is to be expected of a corporate event news release. The key sentence from that news release, however, was this: “Walmart and Jet will maintain distinct brands, with Walmart.com focusing on delivering the company’s Everyday Low Price strategy, while Jet will continue to provide a unique and differentiated customer experience with curated assortment.”
In 2020, just four years after buying Jet.com, Walmart closed the Jet.com website. Management extolled the benefits of the deal, which supposedly helped Walmart up its online retail game. But, in the end, Jet.com really wasn’t an investment win for Walmart.
This brings the story to Vizio, which makes electronics and, more recently, has created a software platform for advertising. Advertising is a new growth initiative for Walmart. So, in some ways, the $2.3 billion Vizio deal makes sense. Given Walmart’s market cap of over $700 billion today, it’s not exactly a huge transaction.
The problem is that Walmart hasn’t been specific about what Vizio brings to the retailer other than some new software. During the company’s fourth quarter 2024 earnings call, Walmart CFO John David Rainey noted:
We’re also excited about the addition of VIZIO and its SmartCast operating system to our portfolio of advertising capabilities. VIZIO will help us serve customers in new ways to enhance their shopping journeys while also creating new opportunities for advertisers to connect with customers and boost product discovery, empowering brands to realize greater impact from their advertising spend with Walmart.
When pressed on the issue by an analyst, the company’s U.S. head explained:
The operating system in VIZIO is an impressive operating system. It works with very little friction. It’s easy to set up and install. I have several of these personally, and I’ve acquired more since we started talking about this acquisition.
Neither of those statements offers a lot of detail about how Walmart actually plans to make use of Vizio’s software. It seems more like Vizio has interesting software that could help Walmart, so they bought it, and now they’ll try to figure out if that’s true or not. This is clearly a glass-half-empty view of the situation, but given the Jet.com outcome, it is one that investors should probably take seriously. After all, Walmart is a retailer, not an advertising company. Past efforts to broaden into different categories, like finance (such as check cashing), haven’t exactly turned into huge wins, either.
Walmart is a giant company, and a $2.3 billion mistake won’t be that big of a deal if that’s what the Vizio purchase ends up being. That said, it isn’t a good thing if the company wastes investor money or if it goes down distracting rabbit holes that don’t pan out. This giant retailer won’t suddenly become a bad company because of Vizio, but it could be an indication that, perhaps, Walmart should be giving more money back to shareholders because it is having trouble finding growth investments on which it is worth spending shareholder money.
Before you buy stock in Walmart, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Walmart wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider whenNetflixmade this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation,you’d have $461,558!* Or when Nvidiamade this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation,you’d have $578,035!*
Now, it’s worth notingStock Advisor’s total average return is730% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to147%for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you joinStock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 5, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Will Walmart’s $2.3 Billion Advertising Bet Work Out Better Than Jet.com? was originally published by The Motley Fool
